Kamni Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33805 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -450 Year- 2014 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Kamni Devi wife of Shankar Choudhary resident of Village- Lalpur, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuradha Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution story, the petitioner along with other is alleged to have murdered Gudiya Devi (deceased) by pressing neck.
It has been submitted of behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2015. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is a lady and she has been falsely been
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33805 of 2015 (3) dt.05-10-2015 P2/2 implicated in this case. Deceased is non-else but Gotni of the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the State that at the instance of one Ankit, the present First Information Report was instituted by his Mausi. Besides, eye-witness to the occurrence, the other villagers have also stated regarding the presence of said Ankit at the time of occurrence.
As per the allegation made by said Ankit, it is the petitioner and her husband who are said to have strangulated the deceased to death.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to the grant bail to this petitioner and the same is rejected.
Anyhow, the Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferable within one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) Saif/- U T