Lovely Sharma @Lavli Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11912 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2022 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Lovely Sharma @LAVLI Sharma Son Of Binod Sharma @ Vinod Mistry R/V- Tilakpur Durgasthan, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Balram Kapri For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the allegation against five unknown miscreants is that they boarded on two motorcycles came and on weapon point looted motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR10H-3939 and other articles from the informant and fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11912 of 2023(3) dt.24-08-2023 2/2 confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.04.2023.

Learned APP appearing for the state has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner has got several criminal antecedents and looted motorcycle was recovered from outside house of the petitioner which is also belongs to the petitioner.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact and gravity of the nature, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Manishkumar/- U T