Uday Shankar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Urban Development Department Govt. Of Bihar And
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.783 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2068 of 2014 ====================================================== Uday Shankar Singh son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of Juran Chapra, Road No. 5, Ward No. 3, P.S.- Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Amrit Lal Meena.
2. Sri Amrit Lal Meena, the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation through the Commissioner, Muzaffarpur, namely Sri Ramesh Ranjan Prasad.
4. Sri Ramesh Ranjan Prasad, the Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam, Muzaffarpur.
5. Sri Abhishek Ranjan, the Officer in Charge, Brahampura Police Station, Muzaffarpur.
6. Uma Shankar Singh, S/O Late Mahendra Singh At- Juran Chapra, Road No. 5, Ward No. 3 (Old) 4 (New), P.O.- M.I.T., Muzaffarpur, P.S.- Brahampura, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Adv. For the Respondent-State : Mr. M. K. Singh, SC-6 For Respondent-Corporation : Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Learned counsel for the parties are present.
Mr. Nikesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation has referred to Annexure 'C' which is an order of the Municipal Commissioner, Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation disposing of the proceedings. He thus submits that the order passed in the writ petition requiring an expeditious disposal stands complied. In view of the order present at Annexure 'C' to the
Patna High Court MJC No.783 of 2016 (5) dt.10-05-2017 supplementary show cause the contempt application is disposed of. The petitioner, if so aggrieved by order may seek his remedy before the appropriate forum.
The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U