Govind Prajapat @ Govind Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50131 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2012 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Govind Prajapati @ Govind Prajapat Son of Suresh Prajapat Resident of Village - Shahpur Pokhara, P.S. Town Aurangabad, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Aurangabad Barun P.S. Case No. 162 of 2012 for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named and allegedly he confessed his guilt. The petitioner in custody since 30.08.2015, but he has not been put on T.I.P.

Submission is that similarly situated co-accused Sudhir @ Babloo @ Babil Kumar @ Babil has already been allowed bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23535 of 2015 vide

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50131 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2 / 2 order dated 09.07.2015 by different Bench of this court to which learned APP does not dispute.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that against the petitioner charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, arising out of Aurangabad Barunn P.S. Case No.162 of 2012 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reasons shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

Rajiv/- (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) U T