← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8499/2018disposed

Anil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-01Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8499 of 2018 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Yadav, S/o Krishan Dev Yadav @ Kishun Dev Yadav, R/vPacharatan, P.S.-Basopatti, District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

4. The Officer In Charge of Basopatti P.S. Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish -SC 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 01-05-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle ( Silver Colour Mahindra Company Motorcycle) bearing Registration No. BR-32N-1735, which has been seized in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.187/16 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending initiation/ finalization of the confiscation proceedings, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending initiation/ finalization of the confiscation proceedings and

Patna High Court CWJC No.8499 of 2018(2) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing the bank guarantee to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Madhubani within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the bank guarantee and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Sunil/- U