Sushil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 15627 of 2016 =========================================================== 1 Sushil Kumar, son of Shri Narayan Yadav, resident of Flat No 103, Maa Jegeshwari Tower, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Kanti Factory Road, Kankarbagh, Patna - 20 2 Rajnish Ranjan, son of Shri Ram Sharan Yadav, resident of C/o - Bijay Chemistry Centre, Bapu Nagar, Baluahi, Post + Police Station - Khagaria, District - Khagaria 3 Shweta, daughter of Shri Mahendra Prasad, resident of Village - Rupaspur, Post - Sahay Nagar, Police Station - Rupaspur, District - Patna 4 Kumari Jyoti Prabha, daughter of Shri Jawahar Lal Sahl, resident of Near Dr L K V D College, Post + Police Station - Tajpur, District - Samastipur, PIN - 848 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna 2 The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna 3 The Staff Selection Commission though its Secretary, Post - Veterinary College, Patna - 14 4 The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Post - Veterinary College, Patna - 14 5 The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Post - Veterinary College, Patna - 14 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : M/s Chakrapani, Sanjay Kr Singh & Dipak Kr, Advs For the Respondent/s : Mr Chitranjan Sinha - PAAG 2 with Mr Ranjan Kr Singh, AC to PAAG 2 For the S S C : M/s Kamla Kant Upadhyay & Chandra Bhushan Das, Advocates =========================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2 The parties are ad idem that the issues involved is squarely

Patna High Court CWJC No.15627 of 2016 dt.29-09-2016 covered by the recent decision of this Court in CWJC No 11092 of 2016 dated 05.09.2016 (Rupesh Kumar & Others -Versus- State of Bihar & Others) which is Annexure 7 to this writ petition. 3 Accordingly, this writ petition is also allowed in terms of the judgment of this Court, referred to above. 4 Accordingly, the writ petitioners should be eligible for being considered for appointment for the post of x-ray technician pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) U M.E.H./-