← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2243/2023disposed

Krishan Kumar Goyal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-18Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2243 of 2023 ====================================================== Krishan Kumar Goyal, Son of Late Sheo Kumar Goyal, Resident of Panchayat Kusheshwar Asthan Uchari, P. S. and Prakhand- Kusheshwar Asthan East, Sub-Division-Biraul, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 4.

The Collector, Darbhanga.

5.

The Releasing Officer-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga 6.

The Block Supply Officer, Kusheshwar Asthan, Purbi. 7.

The District Supply Officer, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondents :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 18-08-2023 Both the learned counsels have consented that the writ petition may be disposed of with directions to the Commissioner to decide the revision pending before it since 2021.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has taken several grounds before the Commissioner and he may be directed to consider the revision petition on merits duly taking into consideration the grounds raised.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object

Patna High Court CWJC No.2243 of 2023(3) dt.18-08-2023 2/2 for the same.

4. Keeping in view the fact that the revision petition is pending since 2021 for adjudication, it is deemed appropriate to dispose off the present writ petition with a direction to the Commissioner to decide the revision petition as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

5. Needless to observe that before passing any order reasonable opportunity of hearing may be provided to both the parties and pass a speaking order.

6. With the said observation, the writ petition is accordingly disposed off.

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J) shakir/- U