Amit Raj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1106 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1659 of 2012 ====================================================== Amit Raj, son of Sri Ganouri Prasad, resident of village - Khakhra, P.S. Jianbigha, P.S. Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Mr. R.K. Mahajan S/o not known, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Dinesh Kumar, son of not known, the District Magistrate -cumCollector, Sheikhpura.
4. Mr. Sakil Uddin Ahmad, son of not known, District Education Superintendent, Sheikhpura.
5. Mr. Sakil Uddin Ahmad, son of not known, District Education Officer, Sheikhpura.
6. Md. Khalil Ansari, son of not known, Block Education Officer, Sheikhpura.
7. Mr. Sunil Kumar Chand, S/o not known, the Block Development Officer, Sheikhpura.
8. Sri Kedar Prasad, S/o not known, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Kosra, Block, Dist - Sheikhpura.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG- 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 01-11-2017 A supplementary show cause is being filed on behalf of the Director, Primary Education and the District Education Officer, Sheikhpura individually enclosing an order bearing Memo No.634 dated 20.10.2017 of the District Education Officer, Sheikhpura who informs that the order passed by this Court in CWJC No.1659 of 2012 has been implemented and the petitioner has been restored to his position as a Panchayat Teacher. The order also stipulates that the restoration of position
Patna High Court MJC No.1106 of 2017 (6) dt.01-11-2017 of the petitioner would be subject to judicial remedy to be undertaken by the parties. The position is admitted by Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. In the circumstances, the contempt application is disposed of.
Let the Supplementary show cause be taken on record. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U