Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48953/2015rejected

Lalo Sahni @ Lal Babu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-03Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48953 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2012 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Lalo Sahni @ Lal Babu Sahni, Son of Bhola Sahni, resident of village - Parihara, P.S. - Bakhri, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Binod Kumar No. 2(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.52 of 2012 registered under Sections 302 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Begusarai.

Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 20.03.2014 passed in Criminal Misc. No.35094 of 2013 on merit with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial as early as possible.

The report as called for vide order dated 16.12.2015

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48953 of 2015 (3) dt.03-02-2016 2/2 has been received from the court of Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Begusarai vide letter No. 02, dated 04.01.2016 which shows that the record is running for appearance of one accused, namely, Jeewan Kumar and non-bailable warrant has already been issued against him. The court below expected that the trial of the case may be concluded within six months.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider the bail prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is again rejected. However, the learned Court below is directed to take effective stapes to conclude the trial of the petitioner within one year. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within one year, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T