Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8963 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-492 Year-2022 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar S/O Surendra Yadav @ Surendra Ray Resident Of Village- Panchrukha, P.S- Banjariya, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Pravesh Nath Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 07.07.2022 at about 10:00 AM the informant proceeded from Bandhan Bank for collection of money. While he was returning after collection, when he reached at a distance of 500 meters from the village, the blue apache motorcycle riders surrounded him. Out of three accused persons two of them snatched the key of bike on point of pistol and from dicky they snatched Rs.104235/- which was kept by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8963 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 the informant after collection.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., he has been made accused in the instant case on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.11.2024. The petitioner has two criminal antecedent out of which one antecedent is of similar nature as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No.492 of 2022.

7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charges. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T