← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/186/2016disposed

Suresh Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi Department Of Transport Bi

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.186 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7529 of 2015 =========================================================== Suresh Kumar Sharma son of Late Uma Nath Sinha, Resident of Village - Maner Telpa, P.S. Vikram, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi, Department of Transport, Bihar, Patna.

2. Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi, the Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Road, Patna.

3. Sri Ram Kishore Mishra, The Financial Advisor-cum-Chief Accounts Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Road, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate For the BSRTC : Mr. Mukul Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 submitted that a show cause has been filed on their behalf in which it has been stated that payments as required in terms of the order of the Court dated 07.08.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7529 of 2015 have been made.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no chart has been given to him with regard to the calculation made. Be that as it may, there being a specific averment

Patna High Court MJC No.186 of 2016 dt.01-03-2017 2/2 made on oath, in the show cause filed on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 and 3, with regard to the payments having been made in terms of the order of the Court, there is no occasion for the Court to presume that the order has not been complied. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. However, the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 shall ensure that calculation chart, with regard to the payment made to the petitioner, be sent to him within one month from today. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U