Rampukar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt Of Bihar, Patna And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.887 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Rampukar Yadav son of Late Saudagar Yadav, resident of villageBijuli, P.S.- Sadar, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Inspector General of Police- Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
4. The Senior Superintendent of police, Muzaffarpur
5. The Superintendent of police, Muzaffarpur
6. The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, East Muzaffarpur
7. The Officer-in- charge, Sadar P.S.,Muzaffarpur
8. Suryadeo Rai son of Late Ram Baran Rai
9. Vikash Kumar son of Suryadeo Rai
10. Vijay Kumar Rai son of Suryadeo Rai
11. Ajay Kumar Rai Son of Suryadeo Rai All residents of Village- Yadav Nagar, Bhagawanpur, P.S. - Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md.Nadim Seraj (GP-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, learned Government Pleader No.5, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
In compliance with the order, dated 27.09.2016, respondent No.4, namely, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, and respondent No.7, namely, the Investigating Officer of Sadar P.S. Case No.46 of 2009, are present, in person. A supplementary counter affidavit has also been
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.887 of 2016 (4) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 filed on behalf of the respondents. The supplementary counter affidavit shows that, upon investigation, the Police has submitted a police report in the form of final form, under Section 173(2)(i) of Cr.P.C.
In view of the above, the writ petition is closed with liberty given to the petitioner to make appropriate application as regards acceptance or otherwise of the said police report, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(I.A. Ansari, CJ) K.C.jha/- U T