Imran Alam @ Md. Ibran Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12345 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2025 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya ====================================================== IMRAN ALAM @ MD. IBRAN ALAM S/o- Salikh Khan @ Safhik Shah R/v- Barorah Ps- Guraru Dist- Gaya JI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

ABC S/O-XYZ R/O-Sudarshan Bigha, PS-Guraru, Dist-Gaya, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate :

Ms. Rushali, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 30-04-2026 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned A.P.P. for the State and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 24.08.2025 in connection with Guraru P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025, FIR dated 12.08.2025 registered for the offence under Section 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to the prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner kidnapped his daughter, aged about 14 years, for the purpose of marriage.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12345 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. and the petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 24.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Informant, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that victim was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS, in which she has categorically stated that the petitioner had committed wrong with her and medical report of the victim also suggest that she has been sexually exploited by the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Guraru P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025, pending in the Court of Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, Gaya ji-cumAdditional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Gaya ji.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T