Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50094/2015bail granted

Kanhaiya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-12-15Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50094 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2014 Thana -SINGHESHWARASHTHAN DistrictMADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Kanhaiya Yadav son of Late Balkrishna Yadav Resident of village - Pipra, P.S. - Saurbazar, District - Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 78 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired in this case in confessional statement of co-accused Mantosh Kumar @ Mister and accordingly, he has been remanded in this case and he is in custody since 28.02.2015. He has not been put on TIP and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Similarly situated co-accused Pradip Kumar Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav has been allowed bail vide order dated 27.07.2015 passed

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50094 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 in cri. Misc. No. 26650 of 2015.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura arising out of Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 78 of 2014 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U