Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11668/2019bail granted

Santosh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11668 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2018 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== SANTOSH CHAUDHARY, aged about 28 years, Male, Son of Ravindra Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Nagma, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Deo Raj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 7.5 liters of country made mahua liquor from the Dicky of motorcycle of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11668 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 383 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T