Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15278 of 2017 =========================================================== Ashok Kumar, Son of Late Rajendra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-Habibpur, Police Station-Sohsarai in the District of Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director-in-Chief (Admn.), Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Regional Additional Director, Health Services, Magadh Division, Gaya.
5. The District Magistrate, Nawada.
6. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Nawada.
7. The In-Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Rajauli in the District of Nawada.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner by virtue of his seniority claims posting as Head Clerk in the office of the Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Nawada and for which he relies upon a decision of a coordinate Bench of this Court passed in the case of Anandi Das arising from CWJC No.15046 of 2012.
Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has referred to a representation filed by the petitioner raising such grievance, a copy of which is at Annexure-8 which has remained pending.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15278 of 2017 dt.16-11-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of issue raised as well as the fact that the petitioner has already raised his grievance before the authority concerned, I deem it proper to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Nawada to consider the claim raised by the petitioner at Annexure 8 and dispose of the same in accordance with law by a speaking order to be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 27-11-2017 Transmission Date NA