Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10275/2025bail granted

Sanjit Paswan @ Sanjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10275 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- Bahera District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanjit Paswan @ Sanjeet Paswan S/o- Badho Paswan Resident of VillageKasikewal P O- Baluri, P S- Baluri, District- Chatra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, three miscreants robbed the informant of Rs. 38,430/-, a tab, phone and other documents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10275 of 2025(2) dt.27-02-2025 2/2 transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Amit Kumar which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2024 and has two criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T