← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8252/2018disposed

Muroul Block Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-08-22Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8252 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Muroul Block Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. through it's Chairman namely Pinki Kumari, Daughter of Late Ram Chandar Sahani, Resident of Village- Dedoul, P.O.- Meerapur, Via TCA Dholi, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Pinki Kumari, Daughter of Late Ram Chandar Sahani, Resident of VillageDedoul, P.O.- Meerapur, Via TCA Dholi, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Secretary, Animal fish Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

Under Secretary, Animal and Fish Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Director Fisheries, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 6.

District Fisheries Officer cum Chief Executive Officer, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved with the order contained in letter no. 1171 dated 06.09.2017 issued under the signature of respondent no.3, the Director Fisheries, Bihar, Patna, as contained in Annexure-3, whereby it has been directed to the officer(s) of the Department to accept the revenue from the Secretary of the newly constituted Managing Committee. The petitioners are also aggrieved by letter no. 234 dated 22.02.2018 issued by the District Fisheries Officer by which

Patna High Court CWJC No.8252 of 2018(2) dt.22-08-2024 2/2 petitioner no.2 has been communicated to deposit the revenue through Secretary-cum-Treasurer.

3. Learned counsel for the State drawing the attention of this Court to various documents submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition relates to acceptance of the revenue for the settlement year 2017-18 and thus prima facie, it appears that the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. (Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U