← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8526/2022disposed

Md.Nisrul v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8526 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2016 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Nisrul, Son Of Inus Resident Of Village- Neur, P.S. Andhramath, District- Madhubani 2.

Md. Ansarul, Son Of Inus Resident Of Village- Neur, P.S. Andhramath, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Veena Rani Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.2, Md. Ansarul.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

The petitioner no.1 seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8526 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and on account of dispute relating to land, the present occurrence took place in which the accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the injured and as far as this petitioner is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted Md. Safid with lathi causing injury on his head.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries suffered by Md. Safid is simple in nature. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no.1, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Andhramath P. S. Case No.108 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T