← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11692/2025bail granted

Bijali Mukhia v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-22Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11692 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2024 Thana- LAKHAURA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Bijali Mukhia Son of Rajendra Mukhia Village -Katahan Loknathpur PS -Muffasil, Distt -East Champaran 2.

Mantzir Mian son of Kamaruddin Mian Village -Katahan Loknathpur PS -Muffasil, Distt -East Champaran 3.

Majay Kumar Son of Rachheya Sahani @ Rachheya Sahni Village - Mushwa Bhedayari/ Sapaha, Ps- Sugauli, Distt -East Champaran 4.

Shailesh Kumar son of Upendra Mahato Village - Mushwa Bhedayari/ Sapaha, Ps- Sugauli, Distt -East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Rathore@ Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the name title of the petitioner no. 3 in the course of the day.

3. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Lakhaura P.S Case No. 216/2024 dated 17.12.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, total 95 litres of illicit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11692 of 2025(2) dt.22-03-2025 2/2 country-made liquor was recovered from the two motorcycles.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 18.12.2024.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Lakhaura P.S Case No. 216/2024.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T