Govind Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45481 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -NAURANGIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== 1.

Govind Sah, son of Lalbabu Sah.

2.

Kamlesh Sah, son of Chhotelal Sah.

3.

Ranjeet Yadav, son of Deeplal Yadav.

(All are residents of village- Parari, P.S.-Chautarwa, District- West Champaran) .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 30-01-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they had assembled to make preparation for committing dacoity alongwith Guddu Sahni, who was caught red handed with a country made pistol and a live cartridge. The allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that from his possession a knife was recovered and one cartridge each was recovered from the possession of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3.

It is submitted that co-accused Guddu Sahni has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45481 of 2014 (2) dt.30-01-2015 2/2 granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No.585 of 2015 and the case of the petitioners is on better footing. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in Naurangiya P.S. Case No.22 of 2014 with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioners will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T