← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13547/2024bail granted

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13547 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2831 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== SANJEET KUMAR @ SANJIT KUMAR S/O SHRI JAI KISHORE PRASAD R/O KOSHI COLONY, WARD NO. 5, NEAR KUMAR CHAUK, BIRPUR, P.S- BIRPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

SMT. DEEPALI SINHA W/O SANJIT KUMAR , D/O SURENDRA KUMAR SINHA R/O MOH- HAJAM TOLI, SALIMPUR AHRA, P.OKADAMKUAN, P.S- GANDHI MAIDAN, DISTT.- PATNA. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Kumar Shuubham, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP For Opposite Party No.2 :

Mr. Arbind Kr. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled through process of mediation. The terms of settlement mutually agreed upon by the parties and the same is kept at 'Flag-M'. He further submits that in terms of Paragraph

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13547 of 2024(4) dt.05-08-2024 2/3 No. 2 of the agreement dated 29.04.2024, a demand draft of Central Bank of Indian dated 02.08.2024 bearing D.D. No. 042419 of Rs. 1,50,000/- is being handed over to Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, learned counsel who appears on behalf of the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2.

4. Learned counsel for the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2 does not dispute the aforesaid contentions.

5. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has already been resolved through the process of mediation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

6. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No.2831(C) of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that the petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement dated 29.04.2024 annexed with the Mediator's report (flag 'M'), failing which, learned Court below shall be at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13547 of 2024(4) dt.05-08-2024 3/3 liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T