Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7198 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -324 Year- 2014 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Anil Yadav, Son of Madheshwar Yadav, resident of Village- Daya Tola, Pathara, P.S. Mahanpur, District- Gaya (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Sri Kumar Bikramdeo Singh Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-04-2016 Heard Sri Kumar Bikramdeo Singh, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary, learned A.P.P. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 324 of 2014, registered for the offence punishable under section 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code (corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 220 of 2014) has prayed for grant of bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that at least four co- accused have been granted bail by this Court. However, Sri Bikramdeo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, has fairly accepted that the accused persons, who have been granted bail were not apprehended but they fled away,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7198 of 2016 (3) dt.18-04-2016 2/2 whereas, fact remains that petitioner was apprehended by the Police after chase.

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer of bail. Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the case diary.

In view of facts that and circumstances, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail particularly in view of the fact that trial has already commenced.

The prayer for bail stands rejected.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T