Zunaid @ Md. Zunaid @ Janed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7474 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2019 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Zunaid @ Md. Zunaid @ Janed, S/o Asgar, Resident of Village- Chirah, P.S.- Mahalgaon, Distt- Araria.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Jokihat (Mahalgaon) P.S. Case No. 336 of 2019 (G.R. No. 3187 of 2019) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no recovery either from the house or from possession of the petitioner.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the stolen motorcycle has not been recovered from his house and that the name of the petitioner has transpired in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7474 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 confession, however, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Jokihat (Mahalgoan) P.S. Case No. 336 of 2019 (G.R. No. 3187 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/- U T