Pintu @ Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47891 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2011 Thana -PARSA District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Pintu @ Vijay Kumar Son of Birbali Prasad Singh Resident of villagePokharpur, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Taking note of the allegation levelled against the petitioner, again I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 880 of 2011 arising out of Parsa P.S. Case No. 01 of 2011 pending in the court of 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra stands rejected.
The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra has reported vide his memo no. 488 dated 26.02.2015 that out of
nine proposed prosecution witnesses, three prosecution witnesses have already been examined and so far as remaining prosecution witnesses are concerned, he has already taken steps to procure the attendance of remaining prosecution witnesses. Furthermore, the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra has reported that due to frequent transfer of case record of Sessions Trial No. 880 of 2011, the trial of the petitioner could not proceed.
The report of Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra appears to be satisfactory.
However, Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra is directed that, in any case, produce the remaining prosecution witnesses of Sessions Trial No. 880 of 2011 arising out of Parsa P.S. Case No. 01 of 2011 before the court of 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra within four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order and furthermore, the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. Any failure on the part of the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra as well as concerned court shall be viewed seriously.
Copy of this order be sent to Superintendent of
Police, Saran at Chapra without any delay.
Let this order be communicated to the court of 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra through e.mail without any delay.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T