← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9420/2022bail granted

Dinesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-11Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9420 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-963 Year-2021 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Dinesh Rai S/O Late Nandu Rai R/O Vill.- Pokhra, P.S.- Hajipur Town, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 28.98 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the part of the recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner where other family members also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9420 of 2022(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 reside. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 28.98 liters wine is recovered out of which 16.920 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1-cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur P.S. Case No. 963/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T