Jibach Bahardar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18680 of 2016 ====================================================== Jibach Bahardar Son of Late Jhabaru Bahadur Resident of Village-Rampur Mohanpur Block and District-Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Araria, District-Araria 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Araria, District-Araria 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Araria, District-Araria 5.

The Circle Officer, Araria, District-Araria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Narayan Mahto, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md.Khurshid Alam-AAG12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner- "1. That, this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to the respondents to demarcate the land being khata no. 1318, plot no. 750, 755, 752, 756, 767, 833, 587, 588 total area 1 Acre 10 decimal which has been got by petitioner through parcha on 14.06.1988 under Mauza Rampur Block Araria, District- Araria which has been published through Gazette no. 2500 dated 07.09.1986 Revenue Department, District Purnea and same has been issued by Sub-Divisional officer, Araria on 14.06.1988 to the petitioner and after receiving the purcha petitioner has come in possession and

Patna High Court CWJC No.18680 of 2016 dt.01-12-2021 2/2 mutation has made and rent receipt has been got till 2013 and after demarcating further give the direction to give possession to the petitioner and who has filed several representation before authorities for demarcating, matter is pending till today."

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that remedy against the impugned order by way of appeal is available to the petitioner.

4. In view of the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enter into the merits of the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to approach before any forum as is available to him in accordance with law.

5. It is made clear that if the petitioner approaches the appropriate forum, the concerned authority/forum would have regard to the present proceeding being pursued by the petitioner, while considering any issue relating to condonation of delay, if applicable.

(Vikash Jain, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02.12.2021 Transmission Date