Anand Kumar @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8440 of 2018 ====================================================== Anand Kumar @ Guddu, Son of Ram Vachan Singh, Resident of VillageBakhtiyarpur, P.O.- Gamhari, P.S.+Block- Goh, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Collector, Aurangabad, Bihar.
2. Returning Officer cum Block Development Officer, Goh, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar).
3. Munna Singh, Son of Devaraj Singh, Resident of Village- Hasampur, P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.+Block- Goh, Sub- Division- Daudnagar, District Aurangabad (Bihar).
4. Umakand Das, Son of Jagdish Das, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Budhikala, P.S.- Block- Goh, District Aurangabad (Bihar).
5. Dhananjay Upadhyay, Son Ramanand Upadhyay, Resident of Village+P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.+ District Aurangabad (Bihar).
6. Nisha Devi, Wife of Milokinath Bagi, Resident of Village- Budhaikala, P.O.- Budha Khurd, Block- Goh, District- Aurangabad(Bihar).
7. Ramesh Yadav, Son of Bindeshwar Yadav, Resident of villageMiryanpur, P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.+ District- Aurangabad(Bihar)
8. Ram Dayal Kumar, Son of Saryu Yadav, Resident of VillageHasampur, P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.- Shankardih, P.S.+ DistrictAurangabad (Bihar).
9. Rakali Devi, Wife of Ram Dayal Kumar, Resident of villageHasampur, P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.+ District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
10. Rubi Devi, Wife of Jintendra Singh, Resident of Village- Budhai Kala, P.O.- Budhai Khurd, P.S.+ District- Aurangabad(Bihar).
11. Bindheshwar Singh Yadav, Son of Bifan Singh Yadav, Resident of VillageMiyanpur, P.O.- Shankardih, P.S.+ DistrictAurangabad(Bihar).
12. Vinay Singh, Son of Madheshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Saharsa, P.O.- Gamhari, P.S.+ District- Aurangabad(Bihar).
13. Vinay Kumar Singh, Son of Baijnath Singh, Resident of VillageSalempur, P.O.- Daurwan, P.S.+ District- Aurangabad(Bihar). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal -SC3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT 31-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Election
Patna High Court CWJC No.8440 of 2018 (2) dt.31-05-2018 2/2 Tribunal in summoning ballot papers. I find no infirmity in the direction issued which is much within the jurisdiction vested in the Munsif-cum- Election Tribunal.
There is no error in exercise of jurisdiction. The writ petition is dismissed.
(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/Ranveer U