← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/315/2023disposed

Bihar Maa Durga Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd., v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-23Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.315 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3451 of 2022 ====================================================== Bihar Maa Durga Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd., a Registered Company Having its Registrted Office at 102, Maha Saraswati Tower, Ranjan Path, Abhiyanta Nagar, Baily Road, Patna-Bihar 801503 through its Authorised representariven namely Rajan Kumar Ray Male aged about 50 Years Son of Jay Kumar Ray resident of 102, Maha Saraswati Tower, Ranjan Path, Abhiyanta Nagger, Baily Road, Patna-Bihar 801503. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Department of Industries, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Sri Sandeep Poundrik Father name Known, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

Sri Pankaj Dixit Father Name not Known Director, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Sanjeev Kumar Father Name not Known, Director (Technical Development), Department of Incustries, Govt. of Bihar,Patna. 5.

Sri Ramesh Sharma Father Name not Knwon General Manager, District Industries Centre, Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 23-01-2024 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of order dated 27.04.2022 passed in C.W.J.C NO. 3451 of 2022 read with the petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2022. The concerned Respondent / Authority has

Patna High Court MJC No.315 of 2023(4) dt.23-01-2024 2/2 complied the order of this Court on 22.01.2024. Such a compliance is after hearing the petitioner in the light of the orders of this Court dated 27.04.2022. Therefore, scope of contempt petition is limited to the extent what are the directions and in what manner orders have been complied. We are satisfied with the compliance order dated 22.01.2024.

2. Accordingly, the present M.J.C/contempt application stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 22.01.2024 in accordance with law.

3. Supplementary show-cause on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 is accepted.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U