Raushan Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.421 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAUSHAN KUMAR RAY Son of Vijay Kumar Ray @ Hanslal Ray @ Vijay Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Jagharnathpur, P.S.- Kudhani, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Rajiv Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 07.01.2020 passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kudhani Police Station Case No.398 of 2019, registered under Sections 341/323/325/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Considering the nature of offences of the Indian Penal Code alleged as well as the fact that the appellant is in custody since 27.09.2019 and investigation of the case is

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.421 of 2020(3) dt.24-02-2020 2/2 already complete, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T