Lalo Rai Roy And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45483 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2013 Thana -BIBHUTIPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== 1.

Lalo Rai (Roy), son of Late Subi Lal Roy.

2.

Pramod Mahto, son of Deo Narayan Mahto.

Both are residents of villageBelsandi Dih, P.S.-Bibhutipur, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 30-01-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that there is case and counter case between both the parties. In similar facts and circumstances, the co-accused have been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos.2320/2014 and 5907/2014. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

The learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have delayed the trial.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45483 of 2014 (2) dt.30-01-2015 2/2 above-named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rosera, Samastipur in Sessions Trial No.320/2014 arising out of Bibhutipur P.S.Case No.226/2013 after framing of charge with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners.

2.

The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioners will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T