Md. Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51402 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2015 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ====================================================== Md. Pappu, Son of Jakruddin, Resident of Village: Mirzapur Bardah, P.S. Muffasil, District: Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Rekha Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard Smt. Rekha Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.

The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Muffasil P.S Case No. 109 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-b)A, 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1C), 26(i)(ii)(iii) of the Arms Act has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on false accusation petitioner has been made accused. She submits that in the F.I.R. nothing has been indicated as to from which place petitioner was arrested. Only vague statement was made that in jungle while Police arrived the petitioner was fleeing away and he was apprehended. No detail has been mentioned. On the aforesaid grounds a prayer has been made for grant of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51402 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. From the F.I.R. it is evident that while noticing the Police the petitioner started fleeing away and he was apprehended and on his disclosure huge quantity of arms and ammunitions were recovered, which has also been reflected in the seizure list. Those articles were recovered from Gunny Bag. In view of huge recovery of the arms and ammunition as well as the fact that earlier also petitioner was arrested in one of the cases related to Arms Act, the court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for extending the privilege of bail. The petition stands dismissed.

Since the petitioner is in custody, while dismissing the present petition it is desirable to observe that steps may be taken so that, the case may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned S.P. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T