Keshav Ishwar @ Aditya Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8898 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2021 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Keshav Ishwar @ Aditya Raj Son Of Ranjit Ishwar @ Ranjeet Singh Resident Of Village- House No. 25, Ward No. 17, Bakhri, P.S.- Bakhri, DistrictBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-06-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. In fact, the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8898 of 2022(2) dt.14-06-2022 2/3 petitioner has been transpired only on the basis of self confessional statement of the petitioner in Bakhri P.S. Case No. 120 of 2021. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and except the self confessional statement of the petitioner nothing has come during investigation and till date no test identification parade was conducted by the prosecution and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2021. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries six more cases other than the present one.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 47 of 2021, with the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8898 of 2022(2) dt.14-06-2022 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T