Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8480 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-686 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikram Kumar S/O Achchhelal Shah R/O Vill.- Ward No 1, Jadopur, P.sHarsiddhi, District - East Champaran,Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 303(2), 318(4), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and one other were found on a bike and on being asked, they could not produce any document regarding the said bike. It is further alleged that the petitioner himself has disclosed that the bike is stolen one and they were going to sell it out.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the said bike belongs to his relative and that the statement regarding stealing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8480 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 of the bike is concerned, the same is based on the statement of the petitioner himself. Save and except that, there is nothing against him. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The seizure list witnesses are police personnel and police has not followed Section 105 of BNSS while preparing the seizure. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having one criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 686 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T