Pramod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8271 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Sahni S/O Ram Sevak Sahni R/O Village- Kamalpur, P.SKhutauna, District - Madhubani 2.

Paro Devi W/O Ram Sevak Sahni R/O Village- Kamalpur, P.S- Khutauna, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 118 (1), 109 (1), 303 (2), 329 (3), 117 (2), 352, 351

(2) and 3 (5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant is a business of fish and while he was returning house after selling the fist, the petitioner along with others surrounded him. It is alleged that Pramod assaulted with 'lathi', Manoj assaulted him with 'iron rod' and other accused persons assaulted with 'fists' and 'slaps'. It is further alleged that Paro Devi assaulted him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8271 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 with a piece of brick which caused injury to his head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that from perusal of the order passed by the learned trial Court, it transpires that the injury on the head has been found to be grievous in nature, however, there is no repetition of blow. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 25.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Khautana P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T