Ram Awatar Pal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9608 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Ram Awatar Pal Son of Late Nathuni Pal R/o Village - Majhiawan(Majhiyawn), P.S. - Belaon, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Belaon (Bhagwanpur) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the uncle of the informant was assaulted with sharp cutting weapon by unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that during the course of treatment after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9608 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 40 days of the occurrence, the uncle of the informant died. He also submits that the name of the petitioner has surfaced on the statement of the spy. The only material against the petitioner is that he along with the deceased used to graze the lambs, but on that day he was not there. He further submits that there is a land dispute between the informant and the brother of the petitioner due to which he has been implicated in the present case. He further submits that police have not recorded the statement of the deceased while he was alive during treatment for 42 days. Save and accept the statement of the spy, there is nothing against the petitioner. Moreover, a statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.11.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9608 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Belaon (Bhagwanpur) P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T