Kesi Paswan @ K.C. Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48876 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -397 Year- 2012 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== Kesi Paswan @ K.C. Paswan Son of Late Kishun Paswan, resident of village - Parora, Police Station - K. Nagar in the district of Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 407 of 2014 (arising out of Suppl. K. Nagar P. S. Case No. 397 of 2012) registered for the offences under section 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 353, 307, 379, 427, 504, 332, 333, 120 (B)/109 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, 43 named accused persons and 250 unknown persons variously armed illegally took possession over the land of one Abha Choudhary and on information when the police party went there, they damaged vehicle of the police and pelted stones.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48876 of 2015 (3) dt.04-12-2015 2/2 specific allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is alleged to be the member of mob and other co-accused similarly situated have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 40316/2013 and Cr. Misc. No. 52040/2013 vide order dated 23.01.2014 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner Kesi Paswan @ K.C. Paswan is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with S.T. No. 407 of 2014 ( arising out of K. Nagar P.S.Case No.

397 of 2012), subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.