← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16120/2017disposed

Ashok Kumar Das @ Ashok Kumar Ravidas And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-02-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16120 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar Das @ Ashok Kumar Ravidas and Ors son of Todi Das, Resident of Village- Kurwa Tand, Post- Gadi Bishanpur, Police StationKhaira, District- Jamui. 2.

Premlal Kumar, son of Shri Umesh Ravi Das, Resident of VillageDipakarhar, Post- Gadhi, Police Station- Khaira, District- Jamui. 3.

Tinku Das, son of Girish Das, Resident of Village- Bhaluwa, PostMadhopur, Police Station- Chandramandih, District- Jamui. 4.

Dharmendra Choudhary, son of Kaleshwar Chaudhary, Resident of VillageTajpur, Police Station- Chandradip, District- Jamui. 5.

Galim Manjhi, son of Suresh Manjhi, Resident of Village- Kalyanpur, Post Police Station District- Jamui.

6.

Mantu Choudhary, son of Shri Jaglal Choudhary, Resident of Village PostIslam Nagar, Police Station- Chandradip, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The District Education Officer, Jamui.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Literacy, Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha - Gp-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2020 The grievance of the petitioners in the present application is non-payment of honorarium for the period they have worked. Taking work and denying salary amounts to begaari which is prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the District Programme Officer (Literacy), Jamui to verify the record and if it is found that

Patna High Court CWJC No.16120 of 2017(2) dt.19-02-2020 2/2 petitioners have actually worked then they should be paid honorarium for the period they have actually worked. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Rishi Kumar/- U