← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8838/2022bail rejected

Dilip Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-20Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8838 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2019 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== DILIP SHARMA SON OF BECHAN SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGERAHATA, P.S.- BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT- WEST MADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The explanation vide letter No. 12 dated 4.4.2022 is accepted.

Petitioner has renewed his prayer for regular bail in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 243/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code which was rejected earlier on merit by this Court vide order dated 4.12.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. 26463 of 2020 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after one year if the trial does not show any substantial progress.

This Court vide order dated 03.06.2020 had called for a report from the trial court regarding stage of trial and in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8838 of 2022(4) dt.20-04-2022 2/2 pursuance thereof, the report of learned ADJ-VIII, Madhepura, dated 4.4.2022 is on record and from perusal of the same, it appears that the trial is at the verge of completion and learned trial court has given the estimated time for conclusion of trial within one year.

In view of the fact that the trial is likely to be concluded within a short span of time, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after one year if the trial does not conclude. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U T