Kahkashan Anjum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4235 of 2024 ====================================================== Kahkashan Anjum Wife of Md. Reyaz, resident of Village Rajpur, Ward No. 11, Panchayat Parsahi, Block and Police Station Khutauna, District Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

3.

The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

4.

The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Khutauna, Police Station Khutauna, District Madhubani.

5.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Khutauna, Police Station Khutauna, District Madhubani.

6.

Nasibun Nisa, wife of Md. Kasim, resident of Village Daulatpur, Police Station Khutauna, District Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhas Ranjan, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(A). A Certiorary for setting aside the order dated 17.07.2023 (Annexure-3) passed by the District Magistrate, Madhubani (Respondent No.2) whereby Anganwari Appeal No. 02/202122 filed by Nasibun Nisha (Respondent No.6) has been allowed and the order dated 26.12.2021 (Annexure-2) passed by the District Programme Officer, Madhubani in Misc. Case No. 02/2019 (Annexure-3) has been set aside and thereafter

Patna High Court CWJC No.4235 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 petitioner has been removed from the post of Sevika of Aanganbari Centre 182, Ward No. 11, Panchayat- Parsahi in the District of Madhubani. (B). A Mandamus commanding the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Sevika of Grampanchayat Parsahi, Ward No. 11, Centre No. 182 in the District of Madhubani."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U