Gaurav Kumar Sahani @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11773 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2023 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar Sahani @ Sonu @ Sanu Sahni, S/O Late Gopal Sahani R/O Arya Kumar Road, Machhua Toli, P.S- Kadam Kuan, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Sri Rajendra Narain, Sr. Advocate Sri Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Sri Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026
1. Heard Sri Rajendra Narain, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases under Section 379 read with other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code and from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of firing is against Babloo Sahni @ Govind Sahni and petitioner, being his elder brother, came to be implicated who is not alleged to have fired. It is further submitted that charges against the petitioner stand framed by an order dated 17.03.2026. It is next submitted that petitioner had earlier moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 25685 of 2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11773 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 and the same came to be rejected vide order dated 02.05.2024 by this Court after considering the case on merits but then it is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is not alleged to have fired.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Session Trial No. 2479 of 2025 arising out of Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 50 of 2023.
6. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T