Amarjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7772 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2025 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== Amarjeet Yadav S/o- Anand Kumar Yadav @ Nanda Yadav Mohalla- Near Gandhi Murti PS- Beur Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 370 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short is that, during night patrolling, the police allegedly conducted search and seizure operations and recovered illicit arms, ammunition, cash, and liquor from premises connected with the accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Abhishek Kumar, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. No incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7772 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that petitioner bears one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also petitioner having one criminal antecedent of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks and prays for regular bail, the same shall be disposed of on its own merit by the learned court below, without being prejudiced by this order. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T