Patna High CourtCWJC/10146/2018disposed

Lalit Narayan Smarak Prathmik Sah Uchcha Sanskrit Vidyalaya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10146 of 2018 ====================================================== Lalit Narayan Smarak Prathmik Sah Uchcha Sanskrit Vidyalaya, Murli through its Secretary, namely Dezy Devi, Wife of Chandra Shekhar Jha, Resident of Village- Murli, Block- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director (Secondary Education), Bihar, Patna.

4. Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary.

5. The Chairman, Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Bihar State Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

7. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

8. The District Education Officer, Supaul.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.C. Mishra, SC-16 Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16 For the BSSB :

Mr. S. S. Sundram Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 The petitioner is aggrieved because the respondents are not taking any decision to upgrade the Lalit Narayan Smarak Prathmik Sah Uchcha Sanskrit Vidyalaya, Murali in the district of Supaul to High School from the middle School. The Court cannot issue direction the respondents to upgrade the School which is purely executive function. My attention has, however, been drawn to a representation dated 17.08.2015 filed by one Deji Devi, who

Patna High Court CWJC No.10146 of 2018(2) dt.14-08-2018 2/2 claims to be the Secretary of the Managing Committee of the said School.

The Court expects that a decision shall be taken by the respondent on the petitioner's representation for upgradation, if the same is pending and has not been disposed of, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

This disposes of the application.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Ashish/- U