Ravi Sharma @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11750 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2021 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAVI SHARMA @ RAVI KUMAR S/o Virendra Sharma R/o Village- Jaga Pakar Sharma Tola, P.S.- Harsidhi, P.O.- Jaga Pakar, Distt- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari For the Informant : Mr. Yashraj Bardhan Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 149 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari. The petitioner in association of other co-accused in furtherance of common intention is said to have committed murder of brother of the informant by stabbing knife in his abdomen.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11750 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner is a student and lived outside for his study and has no concern with the alleged occurrence.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of the offence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, the gravity of the offence and the materials available in the case diary, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T