← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8941/2018disposed

Sri Anil Gupta @ Anil Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-17Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8941 of 2018 ====================================================== Sri Anil Gupta @ Anil Kumar Gupta, son of Sri Shobh Nath Gupta, resident of village-Kalyanpur Khurd, Police Station-Balua, District-Chandauli, State-Uttar Pradesh.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Confiscation Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4. The Station House Officer, Chenari Police Station, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad -GP7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-05-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Tata Indigo Car) bearing Registration No. UP-65AT-5363, which has been seized in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 62/2017 due to violation of the Excise Act. The prayer made in the writ petition is to release the vehicle in question pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case. It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present

Patna High Court CWJC No.8941 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 case.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and aforesaid criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner, on his furnishing two surety bonds to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question or create a third party interest during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case or prejudice the right of the State in confiscation proceeding. The aforesaid vehicle shall be released within one week from the date of furnishing of the sureties.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U