The State Of Bihar And ORS v. Anil Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.477 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 280 of 2016 ======================================================

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Dairy Development Directorate, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Deputy Director (Head Quarter), Dairy Development Directorate, Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Director (Dairy), Muzaffarpur, Regional Dairy Development Office, Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Dairy Development Officer, Directorate, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Veterinary Officer, Arwal.

7. The Dairy Field Officer, Arwal.

8. The District Dairy Development Officer, Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

Anil Kumar, son of Late Bhukhan Mahto, resident of village- Itasang, P.O.- Itasang, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Heard Mr. Rajeev Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Even though no liberty was granted by the Supreme Court while dismissing the Special Leave Petition of the State as withdrawn and even though the judgment of this Court after being confirmed by the Division Bench stands affirmed by the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, yet the State does not wish to put quietus to the matter and wishes to re-agitate the same issues which have already been deliberated upon by this Court and

Patna High Court C. REV. No.477 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2018 2/2 rejected.

With much restraint on imposing of cost, the review application is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) N.H./- U