← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/372/2020disposed

Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-29Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.372 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3946 of 2016 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Late Rajeshwar Prasad Singh resident of VillageNokha, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas, namely Sri Pankaj Dixit. 3.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, namely Ajay Shankar Mishra, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

The District Development Commissioner, namely Sri Surendra Prasad, Rohtas at Sasaram.

5.

The Block Development Officer, namely Ram Ji Paswan, Nokha, at and P.O. and P.S.- Nokha, Distt.- Rohtas, Sasaram.

6.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, namely Sushil Kumar Singh, Nokha, at and P.O. and P.S.- Nokha, Distt.- Rohtas, Sasaram. 7.

The President of Nagar Panchayat, Nokha namely- Pammi Verma, at and P.O. and P.S.- Nokha, Distt.- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 Heard the parties.

2. This order be read in continuation of the order dated 29.03.2024 by which the opposite party no. 2, the Collector, Rohtas was directed to file show cause under his own signature.

3. Pursuant thereto, the show cause has come on his behalf, is on record, and as per the letter no. 469 dated 19.04.2024, the office of the Executive Engineer, Rural Works

Patna High Court MJC No.372 of 2020(5) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 Department, Works Division, Sasaram has requested the petitioner to appear along with all the documents which finds place in the said request letter itself (Annexure-R/D series).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be availing the said opportunity and will be appearing before the competent authority.

5. If the petitioner appears within two weeks before the concerned authority along with all the relevant documents as required and incorporated in the request letter itself and if the same is in order, payment has to be made within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

6. The MJC No. 372 of 2020 stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U