Uma Shankar Sahu v. Karan Sahu And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1974 of 2017 ====================================================== Uma Shankar Sahu Son of Late Sachidanand Sahu, Resident of Village-Sahu Parbtta, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Karan Sahu 2.
Ashwani Kumar Both Sons of Late Prabhu Narayan Sah. 3.
Ramyogi Devi, W/o Late Shambhu Sahu 4.
Upendra Sahu 5.
Anil Sahu 6.
Yogendra Sahu 7.
Satyendra Sahu 8.
Ajit Sahu 9.
Sabitri Devi All Sons and Daughter of late Shambhu Sahu. 10.
Bamkali Devi, W/o Late Suraj Sahu @ Surjanrayan Sahu. 11.
Brijnandan Sahu.
12.
Tuno Sahu.
13.
Munni Devi 14.
Sangita Devi 15.
Rasi Devi Sl no 11 to 15 are Sons and Daughters of Late Suraj Sahu. 16.
Abhay Sahu 17.
Fudo Sahu 18.
Shabiya Devi 19.
Bhibha Devi Sl no 16 to 19 are Sons and Daughter of late Ram Kumar Sahu. All are Resident of Village-Sahu Parbatta, P.S. Naugachia Parbatta, DistrictKhagaria Old Bhagalpur. 20.
Kamlesh Sahu.
21.
Ratnesh Sahu 22.
Animesh sahu 23.
Bhavesh Sahu. All are Sons of late Surajbali Sahu (Substituted Legal heirs) 24.
Rajeshwar Prasad Sahu, Son of Late Chaudhary Prasad Sahu. All Resident of Village-Sahu Parbatta, P.S.-Naugachia Parbatta, District-Bhagalpur. 25.
Smt. Indu Devi, Wife of Sri Gopal Chouraisiya. 26.
Smt. Sunita Devi, Wife of Pradeep Chaurasiya. 27.
Sri Navin Chourasiya, Son of Late Bachaa Prasad All are Resident of Village-Sahu Parbatta, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Bhagalpur. 28.
Rameshwar Prasad sahu.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1974 of 2017(3) dt.15-07-2025 2/2 29.
Dinesh Chand Sahu 30.
Dhrub Kumar Sahu 31.
Sunil Kumar Sahu All are Sons of Late Sachidanand sahu, Resident of Village-sahu Parbatta, P.S.-Parbatta, District-Khagaria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 On call none appears for the petitioner.
02. Perusal of record shows even on the last date of hearing no one appeared for the petitioner.
03. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in this case and hence, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) anuradha/- U