Tuntun Kewat@Tuntun Ket v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13768 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2014 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Tuntun Kewat @ Tuntun Kat son of Ram Bilash Kewat resident of Doctor English, P.S. - Giriyak, District - Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.N.Shukla(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Considering that no witness has been produced by the prosecution till date and the petitioner undertakes to be physically present on each date of trial, let the Petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Masaurhi Patna in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 231 of 2014 on conditions : That one of the bailors will be wife of the petitioner Tetri Devi, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13768 of 2015 (6) dt.07-10-2015 2/2 That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and for which reason, the Trial Court is directed to send a list of remaining witnesses/ the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order, to the concerned Superintendent of Police, and the concerned Superintendent of police is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. (Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T