Vidyanand Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8862 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2021 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Vidyanand Choudhary Son Of Ganga Choudhary R/O Village- Balua Tola, Bakdiha, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani 2.

Indresh @ Indresh Kumar Yadav Son Of Hari Goit, R/O Village- Inarwa, Ward No.-01, P.S.- Khajuri, District- Dhanusha (NEPAL) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari,APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Deodha P. S. Case No. 97 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. In view of the similar criminal antecedents, the petitioners do not deserve anticipatory bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8862 of 2022(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/2 In view of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, this anticipatory bail application is not maintainable in view of the judgement of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Binay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in [2019 (2) PLJR 1089 (Full Bench)].

Accordingly, it is dismissed as not maintainable. (Sandeep Kumar, J) shakir/- U